Tuesday, December 10, 2013

NFL Picks, Reviewing Week 12 through 14, 2013

The picks went well enough in week 12 to be the only post for regular season picks that I will do for this season wherein I will make the picks and explain the reasoning before making the picks.  But, it was interesting enough that I will likley go ahead and post what my picks are for a decent portion of the rest of the season.  The picks for week 12 were not extremely representative of the season I've been having.  Week 12 was either the best or second best week for spread picks that I've had this year.  Which isn't necessarily to say that I've been horrible with spread picks, I've been above .500 in 6 of the last 8 weeks (though I was below .500 for 3 of the first 4 weeks of the season), just that week 12 was above my normal decent level.

Non Picks
Rams-Bears  Even with Clemens still not producing, the Rams still somehow scored more than forty on the Bears.  Still a good non-pick, the Bears are the better team, but the Rams were in the slightly better position.  The Rams are just playing out the string with Clemens at QB..  I don't know what their general goal is right now.. Coach Fisher and company is still doing a good job of getting value out of the team, but they have a bit of a quandary right now as to whether they should stick with Bradford or look for some other quarterback.  The Bears are a somewhat interesting team right now, McCown has done a very admirable job as a fill-in for Cutler, and the Bears are still somewhat in the hunt for grabbing a playoff spot.

Panthers-Dolphins  Another pick that was good to stay away from, the Panthers did end up winning late on another Comeback Cam drive, but even with the win they were a point below beating the spread.  The public is way too high on the Panthers right now.  The Panthers should have done better in the early portion of the season, but these last few weeks they have been the team getting the breaks.  The Dolphins should be a team without a chance at the playoffs, but they're playing in the soft AFC and hence they still have a fair chance at making the playoffs.

Texans-Jags  Or a Jaguars 'blowout'..  And the basic 10 point principle wins once again.  Another game that was fine to stay away from, Keenum was below average, and the Houston offense did almost nothing.  In no way did I see this happening before the season, but somehow the Texans actually have a fair shot at getting a top 5 pick in the draft.   The Jaguars are a horrible team and, no offense meant to them at all, but also sort of dense enough that they also may win enough to lose draft positioning.  [and they went ahead and won again on Sunday..]  Great job management.  Not that getting Teddy Bridgewater would solve anything anyways.. He plays for Louisville..  Not to stereotype him, but he would quite possibly be similar to a better version of Geno Smith.  (And I don't really have a strong position on how decent of a player Bridgewater is right now, I haven't seen him play beyond highlights.  I might catch some of Louisville's games sometime to see where I would guess that he measures up.)

Colts-Cards Vegas again asked the public to take the Colts, and it came through for Vegas.  The stay away was still the right play, but this was the closest one to 'should have been a pick'.  The Colts are a relative lock to make the playoffs, however they've been showing more of their true colors of late and have been a poorish team that depends on Luck to bail them out.  The Cards are a fairly underrated team, by about everyone, including myself, but I still do not think they will make the playoffs.

I am not certain as to what would be the average of games that I wouldn't pick each week, but, even though I can be irrationally confident about the picks before the games occur, I would guess that it would generally be a little higher than 4 games.

Overall non picks: 2-2.  Obviously not all that great to bat .500, but that's kind of the reason the games were no plays.  I was not convinced either way in these games and therefore my pick would likely be slightly worse than a coin flip, possibly in the area of a 47% proposition.  The two games I won were blowouts, while the two games I lost were somewhat close.                          

Actual Picks
Favorites 
Ravens-Jets Not a lot to say for this game..  The Ravens did what they should have, while the Jets played like the team they are..  A bad team with a poor quarterback.  The Ravens are a mediocre team, but that fits in fine with the mediocrity of the other teams that are 'fighting' for the the 6th playoff seed.  Also, Fluko Flacco is getting paid over a million dollars per game..  Just wanted to mention that little fact. (I think that every time the Ravens come up for my blogging I'll be a little tempted to bring that up.) Congrats once again to management for signing him to an 11 digit deal (including pennies).  The Jets are another one of those brilliantly managed teams, never letting Tebow see the light of day, drafting and playing Geno Smith, still having Marc Sanchez, signing Ed Reed, etc, etc, some GM's never seem to learn.  Funnily enough though, the Jets may possibly still be in contention for the 6th playoff spot when it's week 16.

Packers-Vikings, No way, Flynn is a better QB than Tolzien?  I never would have guessed..  I was slightly disappointed in Tolzien's play, but really he did mostly as expected, the worse part for the Packers was on the other side of the ball.  The defense was kind of beyond poor considering they were facing the powerhouse of CP and and beat-up Vikings team.  Due to the lack of wisdom (And really in this scenario I don't think it makes sense to try and 'find out' what Tolzien can do in this spot..  Imho, generally, not very much information on the long term prospects of a QB can be gleaned from just a few starts.  Case in point, about every single quarterback that's played in the NFL..) of Flynn not playing until the 3rd quarter, the Packers could only muster the tie, and thus did not cover.  Still the right side and a decent pick.  
       The Packers should simply be sticking with Flynn the rest of the way until Rodgers is fully recovered, and as such, if the Lions manage to choke a few games, then the Packers will likely still have a shot for winning the division come week 17.  What did the Vikings gain from this game?  They hurt a division 'rival' since they could not tie for the division lead, but in the meanwhile the VIking's draft positioning was hurt.  This isn't to say that they should have been playing for a loss or anything, but I just find it a bit frustrating when a team like the Vikings is mired in incompetency.. Fairly clearly, in my view, none of the Vikings QBs are competent level NFL QBs.. (Unless the competency is related to how likely it is that one of them can get you a top 5 draft choice.)  It isn't all rocket science, teams without a real plan at the most important position in the game are generally going to be destined for failure.  And by most important position I clearly mean their punter, Jeff Locke, clearly..

Raiders-Titans Vegas and the public were right..., but only by technicality.  The Raiders were around an 85% probability to win the game with less than 3 minutes to play, but then the Raiders D# collapsed, and the Titans got the last minute victory.  Also, I fail to see why there is so much praise directed to McGloin, I haven't been able to pay much attention to the Raiders the last few weeks so I don't have a great read as to how he has played and how his decisions have been, but, in my opinion, Pryor fairly consistently made winning plays, and provides a level of speed that very few people have.  While Pryor's accuracy was poor, he is a very young QB, and it certainly can improve.  Also.. Again the Raiders were given a horrible (/joke) line by Vegas in their game against the Cowboys.  
       The Raiders were quite possibly given the dagger in their game against the Titans, they're still only a game out of the 6th playoff spot, but their schedule is very difficult for the last 3rd of the season.  The Raiders have been in every single game but two so far this season, the ball has just  generally 'bounced' the other way come the final 5 minutes.  Still a decent pick and the right side.  The Titans are, like the Rams, in a weird spot with the decision regarding their QB.  Based on their schedule the Titans are still very much alive to actually make the playoffs, and if they had been able to hold off Luck on a single drive, they could be challenging to host a playoff game.. And if this team would have played in the NFC West this year, then they would be somewhat fortunate to have more than 3 wins.

49ers-Redskins 
I expected the 49er's D# to be dominating, but I wasn't sure what the 9ers offense could do.  Playing against 5 and a half still isn't great, but the reasoning and process of the outcome again appears to show that it was the right pick.

Favorites went 2-2.  Again semi-decent results, despite batting .500. (By that I mean that a blowout win is worth more than a toss up win.  Since the toss-up win was thus likely based somewhat on randomness, while the blowout win was likely a somewhat common result.. In regards to that team winning.)  Two demolition victories, while the two losses were less than a touchdown (in total) from being correct.

Underdogs 
Falcons-Saints 
The Falcons and Texans have frustrated me all season with their ineptitude, the Falcons partially continued it here, but at least this time they covered the spread.  At this point in the season when the Falcons aren't really playing for much besides paychecks and pride, it probably would have been better to just stay away from this game.  It's quite possible that the Falcons will flip from top of the division to bottom..  It's even possible that they could flip from top of the NFC to bottom of the NFC.. Such a disappointing turnaround.  The Saints have 4 more tough games, even if their opposition doesn't necessarily have great records, they're a relative lock to reach the playoffs.

Buccaneers-Lions 
As with all of these games except the Falcons game, the straight-up upset came through as well.  The 'gift' line wasn't entirely inaccurate, considering the Lions had 5 turnovers as opposed the Buccaneers 0, however it was still too high.  If the line would have been accurate, then this would have been a bad play, but with the extra points it was a fine play.  The Bucs are a competent team and I think will finish the season somewhat strongly.  The Lions are one of the most dominant, mistake prone teams in the NFL.  They control their playoff destiny and I'm not certain that they can choke enough games to give the division to the Painkers Packers.

Chargers-Chiefs 
And by 'line' I meant over/under line.. Or not.  But, it did effectivley play-out that the game line was too low, considering that the Chiefs had 2 TO's to the Chargers 0.  It probably would have been better to stay away from this game.  The Chargers have a chance at the playoffs, but quite possibly their losses to the Titans and Dolphins will come back to 'haunt' them.  When the Chiefs were 8-0 I still thought there was actually a possibility that they would not make the playoffs, but since then the playoff bubble has weakened and the Chiefs are a fairly safe lock for the 5th seed.

Patriots-Broncos 
Well, it started off extremely well for the Broncos, but it did not end well for them..  Considering the weather, I don't think the game should have been as close as it was.  The Pats were the right side and the line was off.  The Patriots are actually underrated by Vegas and by the public and this is even with them being a relative lock to be the #1 or #2 seed. The Broncos four remaining teams are all below .500 so that, combined with the weather, should help to soften up the Broncos for the playoffs, even if they will quite possibly enter with the #1 seed.

Cowboys-Giants
Answer: There is no downside.  The Giants made the game closer than it should have been, but the Cowboys showed that they are indeed, somewhat clearly, the better team.  The Cowboys have a tough remaining 4 games and may not make the playoffs, but it won't be the fault of Romo..  The Giants started their late season run a game or two late, but they can still play the role of spoiler.

Steelers-Browns 
And then, once Campbell was injured, Roethlisberger is on one side of the field with Weeden on the other side..  The Steelers play some playoff-peripheral teams the next few weeks so they have a chance to create some of their own breaks.  The Browns offense is so poor.. And that's with a top 5 receiver.  Without Gordon they might be scoring 13 a game.  Other than draft positioning, what are the Browns gaining from playing QBs of the ilk of Weeden and Campbell?

6-0 with picking underdogs.  As usual, underdogs were where everything comes together for me.  As I mentioned, five of the 'underdogs' managed straight-up victories, and all of the underdogs were able to cover the spread.  Overall spread record for the week for all games was 10-4.  The overall record in games that I would have picked was a very decent 8-2.

More quick analysis:  The 4 losses I had (as related to the spread) for the week were the Packers by 4.5, the Panthers by .5, the Texans by 17.5, and the Raiders by 2.5.  Overall average loss of 6.25 points, but obviously the Texan's outlier kind of messes with that.  The wins were by 4.5+19.5+18.5+12.5+8.5+ 12.5+26.5+5.5+5.5+15.5 which means an average win of 12.9 points.  
        And in actual games that I picked, the mean loss would be 3.5 points and the mean win would 10.4.  (Quick sidenote, it doesn't necessarily provide any great insightful information, but the three largest overall point differential games in relation to spread were all decided in the non-picks.)  Very solid numbers here as well, 3.5 obviously isn't significant over 2 games, but it at least means the two games were only a play away from being a victory, while average wins at 10.4 are slightly more significant since they are spread across 8 games and partially shows that the picks were indeed decent picks.

Picks for week 13
While this may be partially revisionist history (which is obviously not a great idea..), my main picks likely would have been something like Eagles, Falcons, and Raiders, which would have gone 2-1.  Most likely, however, I would have made other picks as well.  Since I did not officially decide on these picks beforehand, they will not be considered into my overall record.

Picks for week 14
There were some somewhat strong leanings, but no picks for the Bucs, Steelers, Broncos, Rams, and Chargers.  Only four picks for week 14.  Actual picks, in order of confidence, Cowboys, Raiders,  Eagles, Texans.  As a quick note, all  four of the lines are accurate, except for the Texan's line, which actually favors the Jaguars.  Apparently the Jets poor play in recent weeks was enough to match the poor perception of the Raiders, considering that this week is the first week in quite a few weeks in which the Raider's line is a somewhat fair line. 

I had many more struggles for week 14 than the previous two weeks.  The somewhat strong leanings only went 3-2. Bucs, Broncs, and Chargers all with blowout victories, while for the two losses the Rams were blown-out and the Steelers lost a somewhat close game (spread-wise).  While I had another winning week overall for picking the spread.  The games that I did pick finished with a very poor 1-3 record.  

I'm not entirely certain what happened in the Cowboys game.  The Bears are a decent team, and McCown is a good QB, but still, the Cowboys should have had the offense to win that game. I cannot completely make a determination as to whether that was the right side and if that should have been a pick, but I would tend to still say yes.  

While the Raiders were the right side, the game probably should have been a stay away..  I still don't understand why the Raiders are playing McGloin over Pryor.  They have all-but destroyed their playoff hopes with that decision.

Eagles - For this game, if I would have known about the weather conditions and that Bush would be out for this game, then it would still have been a good pick.  But, if I had known about the weather conditions and not known about Bush, then it would have been a bad pck.  And as I knew about neither it will remain the mostly right side and a decent pick.

The Texans' game never should have been a pick.  Not only did/does it make sense for the Texans to lose that game, but the two teams were partially headed in opposite directions.  The main reason that I liked the game was because I thought that Keenum would play well and partially solidify himself as the starter heading into next season.  But, it makes sense for the Texans to continue their free fall and be able to grab a top 4 draft choice and then either pick up Clowney or trade their pick for other first round picks.  Also, the line was clearly slanted in the Texans' favor, so that should have meant an automatic stay away as well.

Overall record falls to 9-5.  In my future picks I will try to stay away from picking teams whose seasons are finished and from teams who already have a line that is unfavorable to them, because the line favors them more than it should.

Picks for week 15
Originally I did not have very many picks for this week, but I convinced myself on a couple of games that were previously just strong leanings towards that team.  The worst lines (meaning, that they should have been made a few points in the direction of this team) were for the Jaguars (again), Eagles, Seahawks, Ravens, and, for once, the opposition of the Raiders, hence the Chiefs.  Soft leanings: Browns and Texans.  Actual picks: Patriots, Eagles, Seahawks, Steelers, Packers, Tampa Bay.

The first three teams are all favorites, but, other than just liking them in their respective games anyways, the lines show that it would still be advantageous to pick them, consequently I will still take the points for each of those three teams.  Then I take some points and have three underdog picks.  I don't entirely like the Packers and Steelers, those two picks are more heart picks than brain, but I still think that each team is on the right side. 

Results for week 15
The Patriots, Eagles, and Buccaneers all lost.  While the Seahawks, Steelers, and Packers all managed victories. My final overall record falls a little more to 12-8.  Thank you for reading.

Sunday, December 1, 2013

NBA Predictions for 2013

Eastern Conference
Southeast
Miami Heat
The Heat are ready to go for 'not two' this year.  Oden was a decent pickup, Beasley, however, was not.  Still a nasty roster and team for opponents to face, even with D-Wade getting more minutes than he should.  It appears that most teams are vaguely set in their ways for 2014 as well, (barring trades obviously) except for the Heat and Lakers.  The Heat resist the urge to compete for the best record in the NBA regular season of all time.  63-19

Washington Wizards
Keeping Webster was a great move.  If the Wizards can have him and a healthy Wall, then they should be back in the playoffs.  41-41

Atlanta Hawks
Keeping Korver was nice, but he and Horford cannot carry the Hawks to the playoffs by themselves.  40-42

Charlotte Bobcats
Not as many moves for the Bobcats in the offseason as I would prefer, and the pick-up of Jefferson wasn't a very good move, but they at least have Cody Zeller now.  A poor roster is assembled for this season, but not as bad a roster as the Bobcats have had the last couple of seasons.  25-57

Orlando Magic
Going willfully wacky for 'wonderful' Wiggins.. Even if the guy hasn't played a minute of college ball yet.   (At least when I wrote this.) Oladipo is better than most think.. I don't have the Magic as the worst team of all time anyways..  Though, if Vucevic and Oladipo were to go down with injury, then they could possibly challenge for being one of the worst NBA teams of all time.  22-60

Central
Chicago Bulls
If it was not for Coach Thibodeau, then I might have this team at .500.  For some reason D-Rose being healthy again and the Bulls single win against the Heat last season in the playoffs has the media hyped about the Bulls..  Why I am not entirely certain.  Butler is actually the main player that saves the Bulls.  49-33

Indiana Pacers
The Eastern Conference kind of stinks..  Somewhat poor offseason for the Pacers.. Don't know why they picked up Scola and resigned West.  48-34

Cleveland Cavaliers
Anthony Bennette, Earl Clark, Andrew Bynum, Jarrett Jack..  It didn't take the Cavaliers too long to move on from LBJ to field a fairly decent supporting cast.  Trading for a poor man's Korver would be a great move for the Cavs, but otherwise their roster appears to be fairly good.  Bynum isn't a fair player, Bynum is a decent player, and when paired with Varejao I think he can be a very good player.  42-40.

Detroit Pistons
Very odd team..  So many cast-off type players that they acquired and lost in FA.  I don't really understand what they are trying to do, other than get together a bunch of low quality shooting players..  Wins Produced people really like the team, mainly because of Drummond, but sometimes you should trust your eyes over advanced stats.  32-50

Milwaukee Bucks
Odd team two.. (and very high turnover of their roster) Apparently the Bucks have learned from their ways, they finally cast off Brandon Jennings.. And replaced him with Gary Neal..  Something doesn't quite computer there..  Apparently some GM's never learn.  On the brightside, or downside, I doubt the Bucks will have to worry about being a bottom playoff contender this year..  But for the wrong reasons.  29-53

Atlantic
Brooklyn Nets
What do a bunch of overpaid, old veterans get you?  Well, actually these veterans quite possibly get you to decent seeding and the playoffs in the East, but otherwise it wouldn't get a whole lot.  Kirilenko was a good signing.  The Nets are probably this years version of the Lakers.  Unproven coach in Jason Kidd, but I'll still pick them to finish with 53 wins.  53-29

New York Knicks
I did not know that they picked up Artest.  Interesting signing..  Not exactly a great idea (though he did sign for a low amount), but then it is the Knicks..  Welcome to the playoffs (maybe).. By default.  It would be very hard for Coach Woodson to improve the Knicks record this year, and I would say it's almost assured that he will not this season.  Bargnani is starting for the Knicks?  Say what?  Yay Points!, apparently.  46-36

Toronto Raptors
As opposed to a bunch of the other teams, I actually like what the Raptors have done in the offseason.  First time in the playoffs since Bosh and the 08 Raptors.  41-41

Boston Celtics
'The Celtics are awful.  They better just be tanking for Wiggins.'  Huh?  Why?  They do not play in the Western Conference, they play in the Easy East.  With my favorite pro coach, Brad Stevens, they should be a decentish team.  40-42

Philadelphia 76ers
Well, the 76ers are going about being wicked for Wiggins correctly, but, other than from that mindset, they made some bad moves.  While this isn't one of those bad moves, they fail to even have a single player with an 8 figure salary.  20-62

Western Conference
Pacific
Los Angeles Clippers
Barnes is still signing cheaply.  Bledsoe is a bit overrated so cue the Kings or Suns trading for him.  Chris Paul is so nasty.  Without Chris Paul the Clippers are still a fair team, but with him they may happen to be a top 4 team.  Coach Rivers should have the Clippers ready to go.  56-26

Golden State Warriors
Curry doesn't even make 8 figures.. Even with his injury history he kind of got a bad deal.  And by 'Curry' I obviously mean Stephen.  Have to give credit where it is due, the Warriors did have a decent off-season.  I think their record will regress to the mean a little bit this year, but they will actually be a better team as opposed to last season. Iguodala is a great pickup.  47-35

Los Angeles Lakers
As opposed to the Beasley signing, I'm partially fine with the Lakers picking up Johnson, since he's a bad player with talent, so it's quite possibly a good result either way..  Certainly an influx of new faces on the Lakers.  They should be able to post a somewhat respectable record.  They are an old team, but they have three aged veterans who won't want to bow to tanking for Wiggins.  39-43

Sacramento Kings
Odd roster number 3.   Losing Evans is kind of bad, but the roster still looks largely fine.  If they played in the East they could practically snooze into the playoffs, but as it is they should be an alright .430ish team.  Vasquez is a great fit for the team.  35-47

Phoenix Suns
Trying to look at their roster and not feel sick is rather hard to do..  In the offseason they traded bad players for more bad players.. Sounds like a great strategy to me.  Credit to their GM for doing a good job of stinking..  (Wiggins surely can't be this good..)  Seeing WP folks peg their realistic prediction at 30.9 wins gave me a bit of a double take..  Don't look at their roster, it causes headaches as to why anyone would actually try to set up this team to be in this position..  Markieff and Marcus?  Gerald Green and Kendall Marshall? 22-60

Southwest
Houston Rockets
Not a great draft for the Rockets, but in the offseason they did pick up D-Howard.  If Howard would just change his form and become a 70% free throw shooter, then the Rockets could possibly contend for the best record in the league.  Beverley kind of had a coming out party last year against the Thunder in the playoffs.  (I especially like the point at 56 seconds where Beverley out-rebounds Durant, Perkins, and Sefolosha.. Twice.  That basically just comes from pure effort.)  I did originally have a fair amount more to say about Beverly and Evans, but for some reason I can't find the file where I wrote about them now.  While Houston's bench is fairly poor and effectively only consists of either J-Lin-Beverley or Montiejunas, their starting 5 may in fact be the best in the NBA.  56-26

Memphis Grizzlies
Decent offseason, the Grizzlies can continue their grind.  Tough team, Miller is nice, but they still need more shooting from deep.  54-28

San Antonio Spurs
The Spurs mostly stayed pat in the offseason.  They make their usual 50+ wins, but barely.  54-28

New Orleans Pelicans
I'm somewhat interested in seeing how the Pelicans roster will mesh.  They may be fairly young, but I think the Cans can be a decent team.  Anthony Davis should improve and hence the Pelicans defense as well.  41-41

Dallas Mavericks
Odd roster number 4. (apparently the odd rosters go in pairs) [At least when I was originally writing this.] Did they have enough roster turnover? The Mavericks are a very different team from last season.  Confusing move to sign Ellis.. I am a little uncertain as what to make of it.. Do the Mavs have some secret medicine that will make him shoot wayyyy more quality shots or something?  If not, then it's a bad move for them.  Cuban seems to be a little off his rocker with the off-season moves. I don't like the current roster for the Mavs.  Third straight year of being one of those teams that hangs around the edge of the playoff bubble on either side.  38-44

Northwest
Oklahoma City Thunder
Golf clap applause for the Thunder, they did (effectively) nothing in the offseason.  Pick up someone like Koufos or Korver?  Nah, we'll just stick with Perkins and Lamb.  Yeah, because doing things like that have worked out extremely well for you in the past..  'Lucky' for them that they have a semi terrific trio..  (I'm of course referring to McGruder, Roberson, and Gomes.  Or not..  And seriously, it is sort of lucky for management that they have such a good trio, because they honestly haven't been making good moves for  while now..  Their drafting/scouting is still fairly impressive.. But their moves non-related to the draft have stunk, Harden, Perkins, etc.)  

Once Westbrook is back, then the Thunder can roll-out him, Durant, Ibaka, Collison, and Sefolosha, and continue to have a legitimate title contender.. Or they could simply keep playing Perkins and stay mired in complacency and being a half step behind other title contenders.  Should be sort of a good thing for Westbrook to be out for a short while so the rest of the Thunder can adjust to him being gone.  Durant isn't going to accept being #2 this season, his scoring average is going to be very decent, especially if the Thunder actually get around to implementing a legitimate offense this season.  55-27

Minnesota Timberwolves
If the T-Wolves didn't have K-Love and Pekovic, then they would possibly be in the hunt for the Wiggins jackpot, but as it is they should be a somewhat strong playoff contender.  Khan is no longer in charge,  despite him near the end making good decisions.. Minnesota should be in position to take a top 5 spot in the West.  Last season the Wolves were effectively certainly going to be a playoff team.. If not for a half-dozen injuries.  This year the injury bug doesn't bite the T-Wolves so badly.  Curious that the WP crowd is off the MN bandwagon this year, I would say that .500 would be a bad year for the T-Wolves.  47-35

Denver Nuggets
Quite possibly the Nuggets will have a better coach.. At the very least in regards to rotations. However, losing Iguodala and Koufos is huge. Still a good team, don't really know what to expect of the rotations.  39-43

Portland Trail Blazers
Good defensive team.. But, with that said, where does the offense come from?  So many non-quality shooters.  Excuse me for saying this, (no, not really), but 'Rookie of the Year', Damian Lillard, is not currently a very good player.  Portland is a fairly young team with the potential to be a very bad team, but Aldridge should be able to carry them to below mediocrity.  I think this will mark the third straight year as a poor team, but not an awful team.  34-48

Utah Jazz
The Jazz must have learned from the Bobcats or something..  Got rid of bad players so that they could pick up more bad players.  It's such a good strategy..  Let's get rid of some of our bad players and trade for bad players from the Warriors.  Sounds like a 'winning' idea to me.  (Actually, I don't even know if the Warriors really won in that either.) Favors and Evans getting more playing time is a good thing, but I do not really see anyone else, other than Hayward, being an above average player.  (though Burke is an unknown entity) 

I'll go ahead and guess that the Jazz give Evans 18 minutes a game the first half of the season, then they realize that he's actually a good player, who knew.., and give him 27 mpg for the second half.  The block is very impressive (though his strength isn't great and he did almost get knocked out of the play), the dunk almost equally so, but really the most impressive part to me.. His hustle.  Somehow he is the one who, after dunking, gets back before his teammates to prevent the easy two.  The Jazz are a good defensive team and they did overachieve last season.. But, I don't necessarily know how they are supposed to field a legitimately competitive team against the tops in the league.  While points are a bit overrated, still they do have to come from somewhere and somehow I don't think that someone like Derrick Favors will be scoring an average of 25 per game. 26-56

Sorry if the quality of this post is a little low, due to time constraints I didn't get to put in quite as much time as I would have liked into this post. To finish it off, here are the 8 teams that I am most convinced about on either overachieving or underachieving as opposed to their projected amount of victories.
Over Celtics, Heat, Lakers, Timberwolves.
Under Bulls, Mavericks, Nuggets, Pistons.
Thanks for reading.